<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yearning to be a part of the conference scene</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boldlygoing.com/2007_09_18/techcrunch-40-conference-hall-monitoring/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boldlygoing.com/2007_09_18/techcrunch-40-conference-hall-monitoring/</link>
	<description>Local Food Is Your Secret To Cooking Great Tasting Meals!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:53:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James D Kirk</title>
		<link>http://boldlygoing.com/2007_09_18/techcrunch-40-conference-hall-monitoring/comment-page-1/#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator>James D Kirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 21:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boldlygoing.com/2007_09_18/techcrunch-40-conference-hall-monitoring/#comment-204</guid>
		<description>Just read Dave Winer&#039;s post today where he talks about it being &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scripting.com/stories/2007/09/19/timeToShakeUpConferences.html#p6&quot;&gt;Time to shake up conferences&lt;/a&gt;.

The biggest items that jump out at me that I think I &quot;somewhat&quot; disagree with is his desire to make conferences in general more open and available to the general public, the globe around. Doesn&#039;t that simply take away from the concept of &quot;going to a conference&quot;?

Now, I&#039;m not in that camp of thinkers that espouse going away from work is the reason for attending a conference (though I admit that I&#039;ve been there in the past, but hey, we grow, right ;) ). No, more for the intense synchronicity and energy exchange that really does seem to come only from being near others.

I&#039;ve no doubt that adding the massive collaborative capabilities that Dave talks about would be very cool, just don&#039;t forget that &quot;someone&quot; has to attend the conference for it to exist!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just read Dave Winer&#8217;s post today where he talks about it being <a href="http://www.scripting.com/stories/2007/09/19/timeToShakeUpConferences.html#p6">Time to shake up conferences</a>.</p>
<p>The biggest items that jump out at me that I think I &#8220;somewhat&#8221; disagree with is his desire to make conferences in general more open and available to the general public, the globe around. Doesn&#8217;t that simply take away from the concept of &#8220;going to a conference&#8221;?</p>
<p>Now, I&#8217;m not in that camp of thinkers that espouse going away from work is the reason for attending a conference (though I admit that I&#8217;ve been there in the past, but hey, we grow, right <img src='http://boldlygoing.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  ). No, more for the intense synchronicity and energy exchange that really does seem to come only from being near others.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve no doubt that adding the massive collaborative capabilities that Dave talks about would be very cool, just don&#8217;t forget that &#8220;someone&#8221; has to attend the conference for it to exist!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
